Tag: fat stigma

You See, It’s FUNNY Because Buying Frosting Is Supposed To Mean You’re A Failure… JK

I’ve been sitting on this post for a few weeks. I thought it would be worth finishing before the end of the holidays. Enjoy?

One of Colbert’s recent Late Show cold opens is a fake ad for Cinnabon’s pint of frosting.

In the sketch, people at a loss of what left to do to survive the boredom and isolation of the pandemic are seen eating the frosting out of the carton (which is clearly some kind of vanilla yogurt). They are sad. One of them is crying in a bathtub. The announcer’s message is: “give up”. I have some thoughts.

First off there seems to be more than one premise. Are they lampooning big fast food for (literally) capitalizing on people’s anxiety and desperation at the expense of their health, while not helping us solve our actual problems? Or are they fueling the entrenched societal narrative of shame about overeating as if due to weakness? Even if the writers mean to fault the corporations, if the sketch still requires us to agree that binge- or stress-eating processed food is a sign failure, weakness, or lack of control, then I think the joke is not worth making. At the very least, the joke should be better crafted, more on target. I see that the main joke of the Colbert clip is that Cinnabon’s rollout of their signature frosting is a reflection of the state of everyone’s pandemic stress and boredom. It’s not really trying to fault individual consumers OR Cinnabon. It’s more of a suggestion that this is the natural, logical conclusion of a months-long life disruption that’s now spilling out into the winter holidays.

… However, it’s difficult for me to give them the benefit of the doubt, since (goodness, I did NOT want to get into this but here we go) Colbert’s Late Show writers have a history of making jokes about stress eating. They make like… a lot of them. Stephen himself has a long history of doing these bits where he feigns sadness or panic and then digs into some ice cream for relief. A few times he’ll even lament “I’m fat” in a sort of “teen girl seeks support after a break up” bit. And I haven’t even mentioned the many times he takes a passing jab at his own appearance; he tends to view his average amount of athleticism, muscle, and fat as evidence that he’s undisciplined, unaccomplished, and generally not manly (all in spite of the fact that Colbert is a very rich and successful actor). He and his team also write fat jokes about Republicans (most notably Christie and Trump) that draw on stereotypes you can leverage against ANY fat person.

Liberals need to know better than to make arguments that rely on fat stigma, and they should know that, while internalized fat bias is a fact of life, it is a part of the personal-responsibility narrative that lets institutions off the hook and is demonstrably false. It’s hazardous to make jokes that acknowledge how we feel about fat and food, and yet not challenge it.

Happy Holidays

P.S.: I’m only upset because I care about you, Stephen.

You’ll Benefit More From Exercise Than From Being Thin

The University of Cambridge published a longitudinal study in 2015 that found people were twice as likely to die prematurely if they were inactive than if they were obese. A moderate amount of activity amounting to a brisk 20-minute walk daily is sufficient to decrease your risk of death 7.5%. Lowering your BMI below 30 kg/m^2 would only decrease your risk by 3.6%.

            This data is important, not just to reduce fat stigma but also to orient people at all levels of fatness toward an achievable, manageable, and sustainable threshold to increasing health outcomes. If these findings ring true, then the scary level of hype from the fitness industry, wellness industry, and the medical field is overwhelming, and it will continue to intimidate and dissuade many people from getting the benefits from exercise that they deserve. People should have the right not to exercise, but this toxic association between fatness and health, versus exercise and health, has got to go.

P.S.:

You know what ELSE would be nice? If major publications would refrain from using misleading, lazy, garbage microaggressions. This article in Scientific American from 2015 mentions that people can see health benefits from walking at a casual pace for just 2 minutes every hour, though at least 150 minutes a week of more “moderate intensity” exercise such as brisk walking is recommended. The article ends thus:

“The assumption here, of course, is that those casual walks around the house don’t take you to the refrigerator for a snack.”

… A blatant, and frankly unnecessary, piece of fat prejudice. Note that nowhere in the article is there a discussion of obesity or caloric intake. The POINT, people, is that a casual exercise like walking can improve your body’s functioning, not that it reduces fat. Eating will not “erase” the benefits.