Um… I Think South Park Just Criticized Liberal Media and No One Is Talking About It

SPOILER WARNING: Contains spoilers for the South Park Vaccination Special

CONTENT WARNING: Politics

Curiously, the argument between the anchor and reporter about the “passion” of the kids for stealing the vaccines and distributing them independently… this entire bit is absent from every review I’ve read about the episode. It’s not mentioned in any of the summaries.

Not AV Club. Not Indie Wire. Not Den of Geek, IGN, Collider, or even The Daily Beast.

For me, this was a big moment of the special. The news anchor argues that the anti-vaccine Q-Anon kids are just as valid in fighting for what they believe in as the pro-vaccine kids. Here, Trey Parker claims that you can use the same rationale to justify the acts of one group as the other. Since the initial confrontation between the two groups were reminiscent of the Capitol riot in January (ffs Butters waves that big U.S. flag), I’m preeeetty sure this as an indictment of the liberal media for their coverage of the BLM protests in the summer. I have seen conservatives and libertarians online pointing out a perceived hypocrisy of liberal media qualifying the Capitol rioters as “traitors” and “insurrectionists” and “seditionists”, while elevating any rioters during the BLM protests to an exalted status, or excusing their behavior as “frustration” with the system. Now, I personally do not think these events are equivalent. What I AM suggesting is that Trey Parker is probably making the comparison in order to admonish the liberal media for stoking acceptance of violence at police and property during the BLM protests. At the very least, Parker seems to posit that the Capitol rioters’ violent actions are logically consistent with their beliefs; it’s pointless to claim it was “senseless”, as the media often does. This criticism of liberals would be on brand for South Park, since Parker and Matt Stone have a solid history ridiculing any liberal or conservative who takes a belief as gospel and runs with it. Whether any of us agrees with Parker’s comparison or not, I think he is making it. Liberal outlets have already criticized South Park for its role in stowing political cynicism to the point of inaction, and for contributing to trolling culture. Why aren’t they talking now?

The referenced reviews:

South ParQ Vaccination Special Review: The futility of returning to normal (avclub.com)

‘South Park Vaccination Special’ Review: Comedy in Crisis — Spoilers | IndieWire

South Park Vaccination Special Review | Den of Geek

South Park: ‘South ParQ – The Vaccination Special’ Review – IGN

South Park Vaccination Special Review: A Hilarious Return to Normal (collider.com)

‘South Park’ Brutally Mocks Wacky QAnon Supporters in Vaccination Special (thedailybeast.com)

Yeah We FIGURED Exercise Can’t Completely Stop Fat From Making You Sick. Your Point??

Just a quick rage post, everyone. This week you may have found some punchy, alarming news headlines pop up such as “FAT BUT FIT IS A MYTH”. Scary news. Scary fat news. It’s that kind of thing when “journalists” are desperate for material so they dig into recent academic research to pull out a claim out of context that gets everyone’s attention. Bravo. These news stories are alluding to a study out of a Spanish university that concluded people in “overweight” and “obese” BMI categories remained at high risk of cardiometabolic diseases like high cholesterol, hypertension, and diabetes. But in both the articles I read – one from CNN and one from U.S. News & World Report (see below for links) – the study authors reiterate that their findings also show that regular physical exercise lowered everyone’s risk of these diseases regardless of their BMI, corroborating other studies. I’ve written about this before. CNN interviewed a Duke University administrator who cautioned that this is a correlative – not causative – cross-sectional study (one of the easiest ones to conduct). He mentioned that it could be that some “obese” participants started exercising regularly BECAUSE they learned they had new health issues. You can’t know from a study like this.

This brings me to my biggest beef here…. wh- what… who are these articles for? What do you hope to accomplish? They’re setting up a straw man of well you know, you can’t stay FAT and expect exercise to fix any issues your fat may be causing. Wh- who the hell is saying this? The study authors admit exercise still helps. Besides, again, there still is not scientific consensus about what exactly makes people get fatter and how fat influences disease. And, again,

WE DO NOT YET KNOW HOW TO SHRINK FAT AND MAINTAIN LEANNESS AT A POPULATION LEVEL

Both the articles (both of them?) have a wrap-up with some authority claiming that it’s important to be physically active and get or stay lean. Ok, but HOW? Get out of here with this shit. And shame on the writers and editors for including good news somewhere in the text while having misleading titles and introductions that imply the opposite. Save it for the Daily Mail.

Exercise Doesn’t Boost Health If You Stay Obese, Study Finds | Health News | US News

‘Fat but fit’ is a myth when it comes to heart health, new study shows – CNN

You See, It’s FUNNY Because Buying Frosting Is Supposed To Mean You’re A Failure… JK

I’ve been sitting on this post for a few weeks. I thought it would be worth finishing before the end of the holidays. Enjoy?

One of Colbert’s recent Late Show cold opens is a fake ad for Cinnabon’s pint of frosting.

In the sketch, people at a loss of what left to do to survive the boredom and isolation of the pandemic are seen eating the frosting out of the carton (which is clearly some kind of vanilla yogurt). They are sad. One of them is crying in a bathtub. The announcer’s message is: “give up”. I have some thoughts.

First off there seems to be more than one premise. Are they lampooning big fast food for (literally) capitalizing on people’s anxiety and desperation at the expense of their health, while not helping us solve our actual problems? Or are they fueling the entrenched societal narrative of shame about overeating as if due to weakness? Even if the writers mean to fault the corporations, if the sketch still requires us to agree that binge- or stress-eating processed food is a sign failure, weakness, or lack of control, then I think the joke is not worth making. At the very least, the joke should be better crafted, more on target. I see that the main joke of the Colbert clip is that Cinnabon’s rollout of their signature frosting is a reflection of the state of everyone’s pandemic stress and boredom. It’s not really trying to fault individual consumers OR Cinnabon. It’s more of a suggestion that this is the natural, logical conclusion of a months-long life disruption that’s now spilling out into the winter holidays.

However, it’s difficult for me to give them the benefit of the doubt, since (goodness, I did NOT want to get into this but here we go) Colbert’s Late Show writers have a history of making jokes about stress eating. They make like… a lot of them. Stephen himself has a long history of doing these bits where he feigns sadness or panic and then digs into some ice cream for relief. A few times he’ll even lament “I’m fat” in a sort of “teen girl seeks support after a break up” bit. And I haven’t even mentioned the many times he takes a passing jab at his own appearance; he tends to view his average amount of athleticism, muscle, and fat as evidence that he’s undisciplined, unaccomplished, and generally not manly (all in spite of the fact that Colbert is a very rich and successful actor). He and his team also write fat jokes about Republicans (most notably Christie and Trump) that draw on stereotypes you can leverage against ANY fat person.

Liberals need to know better than to make arguments that rely on fat stigma, and they should know that, while internalized fat bias is a fact of life, it is a part of the personal-responsibility narrative that lets institutions off the hook and is demonstrably false. It’s hazardous to make jokes that acknowledge how we feel about fat and food, and yet not challenge it.

Happy Holidays

P.S.: I’m only upset because I care about you, Stephen.

What Can We Really Learn From Dragon Ball?

On the philosophy and legacy of Dragon Ball and the shonen genre.

As Wisecrack illustrates, Dragon Ball is not just a high-action brawler modeled after Bruce Lee and Jackie Chan movies; in essence, Dragon Ball aimed to teach Buddhist lessons of compassion and open-mindedness through its emulation of Journey to the West. Though a lot of people are getting buff at the gym, the aesthetic and ethics of Dragon Ball and the shonen titles heavily inspired by it (namely One Piece, Naruto, and Bleach) lie not in becoming the “very best” at something so you can beat an overpowered villain who’s vaguely trying to conquer or destroy the world. It’s not about being singularly focused on your goal. It’s about all the sidetracks along the way. It’s about the people you meet and learn about and helping them to solve their problems. It’s about relating your strife to the world around you. It’s about having new and surprising experiences that make you question your place in the world. In my opinion, people who use shonen to prop up their missions to excel at physical training or self-defense techniques in order to achieve a specific body type or become popular are not just shallow. Their super-controlled, super-individualist mindset is antithetical to Eastern philosophy and plays exactly into the hands of Western media values. They live in a space where flexibility, doubt, wonder, and diversity are undervalued or non-existent. Here, your unique talents shouldn’t be valued and put to good use in reciprocity with others – instead, you need to mold yourself into what the social structure deems to be the most valuable asset, because you know that achieving social dominance is the only thing that matters when you can’t trust anyone else to have your back.

Thanks for reading.