This post is inspired by Virgie Tovar’s No I Won’t Cut You A Smaller Slice of Cake.
People look for rational ways to justify their prejudice toward being fat and certain forms of consumption, noting how being too fat and eating too many processed foods can negatively affect your physical health and your cognition (which suggests a rationale for the belief that fat people have poor moral character). But there’s ample evidence that fat affects everyone differently depending on where they store it and how much they have. Many of the “negative” psychological traits associated with eating a Western diet are due to the emotional and psychosocial consequences of fat discrimination, which takes the form of ridicule, food policing, social exclusion, lack of physical accommodation, and poor media representation. To a great extent, fat prejudice is arbitrary. Signals of body fat and signals of eating habits are symbols; they are a form of social compliance. Keeping to a specific window of body fat and eating certain foods are ways to indicate you’re part of the group. The opposite may as well be the norm – and in fact, in some cultures it is. Not being fat or not eating large quantities of food… these things can make you look untrustworthy, unreliable, and ungrateful. Also, it’s important to keep in mind that fat prejudice is often code for racism and sexism. From what I’ve read, bodies that are non-White or non-male may be more comfortable with fatter bodies and larger portion sizes, and so stigmatizing those bodies and behaviors is a subversive way to discriminate against these groups.